Bias, Rhetorical Devices and Argumentation Essay Example for Free

Bias, Rhetorical Devices and Argumentation EssayThe oral communication it obviously catering towards females, the speech was presented at a U.N. Womens Conference, this speech is about the rights women should expect to receive under human rights. While using the politics to reinforce the rights of women she is using political bias and she is using a sexuality bias.Rhetorical DevicesThis speech has a couple rhetorical devices, the first one I found was a Rhetorical question when she said, Wasnt it after each after the womens conference in Nairobi ten years ago that the world focused for the first time on the crisis of domestic force? Secondly there was a few sections were Parallelism was used when she said If women have a chance to work and earn as full and tolerable partners in society, their families will flourish. And when families flourish, communities and nations do as well. Then again when she stated It is a violation of human rights when babies are denied food, or dro wned, or suffocated, or their spines broken, simply because they are born girls. It is a violation of human rights when women and girls are sold into the slavery of prostitution for human greed and the kinds of reasons that are used to disembarrass this practice should no longer be tolerated.FallaciesTowards the end of the speech a Slippery slope fallacies was used when she stated As long as unlikeness and inequities remain so commonplace everywhere in the world, as long as girls and women are valued less, fed less, fed last, overworked, underpaid, not schooled, subjected to violence in and outside their homes the potential of the human family to create a peaceful, prosperous world will not be realized.ArgumentationThis speech met the standard for stating an end and protecting against counter transmission lines by stating facts that the opposition cannot challenge. There was use of statistics to support Mrs. Clintons argument that women and girls have the same rights as everyone else. She presented her argument in a persuasive way, using her gender to persuade other people of the same gender to understand the issue and presented what needed to be changed. I would say that the argument she presented was very effective. The crowd was applauding the speech instead of using silence to show their disapproval of the words that were said.